<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt"><br />
<span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><hr width="100%" size="2" align="center">
</hr><b>From</b>: "Stefan Schmidt" <sst@sil.at><br />
<b>Sent</b>: Thursday, February 09, 2012 6:45 AM<br />
<b>To</b>: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<br />
<b>Subject</b>: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch</span><br />
<br />
Am 07.02.12 12:38, schrieb virendra bhati:<br />
> Hi List,<br />
> <br />
> Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What<br />
> technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the<br />
> right or wrong but this question come to my mind...<br />
> <br />
I had done some load tests with asterisk 10 and my highest results was:<br />
<br />
1750 calls per seconds up to<br />
13000 concurrent calls<br />
<br />
done on a intel xeon with dual six core and hyperthreading (= 24 cores)<br />
and 12 GB ram. the sysload was around 2.5 during this test.<br />
<br />
so i am not impressed by 1000 concurrent calls.<br />
<br />
best regards<br />
<br />
stefan<br />
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Stefan<br />
<br />
This is on target with my configuration I am working on. What kind of dialplan were you using when running the tests. <br />
Were you doing database lookups or just answering the calls and playing hold music. Any example would be appreciated so we can quantify your test results. I look forward to your response.<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
Bryant<br /></span>