<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I thought it was going to be 1.10.0<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] <b>On Behalf Of </b>vip killa<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, July 22, 2011 2:48 PM<br><b>To:</b> Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>I agree, the numbering seems to make no sense. Oh well it's just an arbitrary measurement of non-progress anyway<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tony Mountifield <<a href="mailto:tony@mountifield.org">tony@mountifield.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme,<br>and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1.<br><br>Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the<br>next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0!<br><br>I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev<br>about it, since the announcement.<br><br>Cheers<br>Tony<br>--<br>Tony Mountifield<br>Work: <a href="mailto:tony@softins.co.uk">tony@softins.co.uk</a> - <a href="http://www.softins.co.uk" target="_blank">http://www.softins.co.uk</a><br>Play: <a href="mailto:tony@mountifield.org">tony@mountifield.org</a> - <a href="http://tony.mountifield.org" target="_blank">http://tony.mountifield.org</a><br><br>--<br>_____________________________________________________________________<br>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br> <a href="http://www.asterisk.org/hello" target="_blank">http://www.asterisk.org/hello</a><br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>