<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p style="margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"><span>Does this ConfBridge requires a hardware timing source? Will I be able to use this on any virtual server without having the need special changes to the VM setup?</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"><span> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"><span>Thanks</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"><span>C. Savinovich<br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"><span> </span></p>
<div style="margin: 5px 0px 5px 0px;">
On April 25, 2011 at 10:27 AM David Backeberg <dbackeberg@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
<br />
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Vossel <dvossel@digium.com> wrote:<br />
> > I am proud to announce that after a good bit of development, community feedback, testing, and >code review, the brand new ConfBridge application has been officially merged into Asterisk >Trunk!!! http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revision&revision=314598<br />
> ><br />
> > If you are already familiar with ConfBridge from Asterisk 1.6.X and 1.8, forget everything you >know.  This is a completely revamped, highly optimized, and feature rich conferencing >application capable of mixing sample rates from 8khz all the way up to 192khz!  Exciting right?!<br />
><br />
> So way back when the 'old' ConfBridge was announced, my understanding<br />
> was it was originally an internal Digium tool for exercising the<br />
> Bridge() code and it was decided to release it to the public in the<br />
> event the code might be useful to others. The old ConfBridge was<br />
> missing stuff that was in MeetMe(), and wasn't that compelling for my<br />
> particular usage.<br />
><br />
> This 'new' ConfBridge looks to be much more full-featured. So can<br />
> anybody explain the motivation for this? Is this a replacement for<br />
> MeetMe() where at a certain point we envision dropping MeetMe() from<br />
> the codebase?<br />
><br />
> Does ConfBridge() scale to many users as nicely as MeetMe? I'm<br />
> assuming the MeetMe ability to use a hardware source for timing will<br />
> still be superior with large user counts in rooms?<br />
><br />
> --<br />
> _____________________________________________________________________<br />
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<br />
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br />
>                http://www.asterisk.org/hello<br />
><br />
> asterisk-users mailing list<br />
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br />
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
</div>
<p style="margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p style="font-family: monospace; white-space: nowrap; margin: 5px 0px 5px 0px;">Christian Savinovich<br />
Telecom & Telephony Consulting<br />
646.982.3572<br />
c.savinovich@itntelecom.com</p>
</body>
</html>