<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:doug@impalanetworks.com" target="_blank">doug@impalanetworks.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
-<br>
Doug Mortensen<br>
Network Consultant<br>
Impala Networks Inc<br>
CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+<br>
Linux+, Network+, Server+<br>
.<br>
<a href="http://www.impalanetworks.com" target="_blank">www.impalanetworks.com</a><br>
P: (505) 327-7300<br>
F: (505) 327-7545<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>Callweaver? <a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver" target="_blank">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver</a>. I believe they forked somewhere in the 1.2 release. Many features ahead of Asterisk.<br>
<br>Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch. That and the hybrid dual license in Asterisk.<br>
<br><a href="http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf</a><br><br>Read the whole piece. I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed and I believe is still helping Asterisk<br>
<br>Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.<br><br>I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Steve Totaro <br>
</div></div>