<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Rymes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trymes@rymes.com">trymes@rymes.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Bruce B wrote:<br>
<br>
> You really want to read the LONG LONG signature from some people before you read the actual latest message? I don't know about that....I guess it's a preference.<br>
<br>
</div>Suffice it to say, Bruce, this subject has been hashed over thousands, nay, hundreds of thousands of times, and I doubt anything new can be had from doing it again.<br>
<br>
FYI, It is also considered good etiquette to remove any non-relevant information from the quoted text to keep it short and easy to parse, especially removing the automatically generated footers from the list.<br>
<br>
As for your question about ports (see, I can stay on topic occasionally!), someone already mentioned something about some equipment using 5004 for RTP, IIRC, and I mentioned the common use of 5061, 5062, 5063, etc for multiple SIP clients behind NAT. There may be other reasons, too.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Tom<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks. That is in both TCP and UDP for SIP right? or simply UDP would do it as well? I am talking strictly in case of Asterisk. </div><div><br></div><div>
-Bruce</div></div>