<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 12/08/2010 02:48 PM, Alex Saavedra wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTikSpcKDTqP0Z-_R+qnEmTsVRjAi32oTUsUhyiMd@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Jonas,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I've been using H.264 and H.263+ with a few Grandstream GVX3140.
When using H.264 the image quality was better, and required bandwidth
appeared lower compared with H.263+. In fact H.264 is expected to
consume less bandwidth for as much as 50% (according to Wikipedia).
Note however that when configuring bandwidth limits inside Asterisk
(maxcallbitrate directive) I saw no effect on client devices. Only
client configuration succeeded (v 1.6.2.7 here).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I kept H.263+ only for compatibility reasons when using X-Lite
softphone (no support for H.264). </div>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,<br>
<div><br clear="all">
<div dir="ltr">Alex Saavedra<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Do you use H263 and H264 together on a peer ?<br>
<br>
Because when I define :<br>
<br>
allow=h263<br>
allow=h264<br>
<br>
there is no video.<br>
<br>
I can only allow 1 video-codec on a peer...<br>
<br>
Jonas.<br>
</body>
</html>