<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Здравствуйте.<br>
<br>
Спасибо за ответ. Меня какраз интересуют проблемы, которые решает
этот кабель. Достать его теоретически мы сможем. Другой вопрос, в
чем же его уникальность? И почему, например, нельзя использовать
floppy кабель? <br>
Когда я поставил floppy кабель вместо "официального" и модулю указал
опцию "timingcable=1", у меня либо вообще система падать стала (так,
что коннект по ssh терялся), либо в asterisk я получал сообщение Bad
HDLC и поток не поднимался.<br>
<br>
Hello.<br>
<br>
<span id="result_box" class="long_text" lang="en"><span style=""
title="">Thank you for your reply. </span><span style=""
title="">I'm interested in problems that solves this cable. We
can </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" title="">get it
theoretically. </span><span style="" title="">Another question,
what is its uniqueness? </span><span style="" title="">And why,
for example, we can not use the floppy cable?<br>
</span><span style="" title=""><br>
When I put the floppy cable instead of an "official" and set the
option module "timingcable = 1", I either do a system has to
fall (so that the connection was lost over ssh) or I get the
message Bad HDLC in </span></span><span id="result_box"
class="long_text" lang="en"><span style="" title="">asterisk </span></span><span
id="result_box" class="long_text" lang="en"><span style=""
title=""> and the E1 flow was not raised.</span></span><br>
<br>
<br>
On 29.11.2010 10:16, Grigoriy Puzankin wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4CF35360.1080306@hoster.ru" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Здравствуйте, Антон.
Мы заказывали кабель у Мототелекома (если не ошибаюсь). В наличии у них
его нет, но под заказ с очередной поставкой они могут его достать. Либо
купите через e-bay или вражеский интернет-магазин.
У нас он соединяет две 4-портовые карточки. Не помню, что именно было до
того, как его поставили, но какие-то проблемки были.
25.11.2010 19:23, Захаров Антон пишет:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello everyone.
I have a timing slips errors and I can't understand what source of the
problem is.
My installation has 2 digium cards: TE420 and TE220 cards in one server.
There are 3 spans (E1) to PSTN and 3 spans to internal PBS stations -
normal installation for transit communication.
Span configuration is:
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 #TE420 - first port. To PSTN.
span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3 #TE420 - second port. To PBX.
span=3,2,0,ccs,hdb3 #TE420 - third port. To PSTN.
span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3 #TE420 - fourth port. To PBX.
span=5,3,0,ccs,hdb3 #TE220 - first port. To PSTN.
span=6,0,0,ccs,hdb3 #TE220 - second port. To PBX.
I should to say, that PBXs are interconnected through router (doesn't
know anything about it). So all schema looks like this:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://yfrog.com/jjschemaj">http://yfrog.com/jjschemaj</a>
Spans 1-5 works fine, but on span 6 (marked bold) I have rising timing
slips counter.
I think it's appearing because I'm getting a primary timing source on
span 1 - first port on TE420. But TE220 doesn't use it's span 5 for
timing source, because it has priority 3, so it could be a sync problem.
Am I wrong?
I'm started to think about timing cable for syncing timing on first card
and second. Should I use it?
It's a problem to bought cable in our city (Russia,Moscow). All
resellers sell only cards. Could I use floppy or IDE cable to
interconnect cards? As I see in picture of cable, it's a direct 16 pin
cable.
Does anybody know something about timing cable for different cards? How
I can solve my problem?
Thanks for attention
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>