Here are result of dahdi_test:<div><br></div><div><div>[root@ip-10-251-123-3 ~]# dahdi_test</div><div>Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy...</div><div>99.725% 96.018% 99.532% 91.934% 99.923% 99.923% 99.628% 99.434%</div>
<div>-434.763% 99.239% 93.770% 99.141% 99.822% 91.232% 99.727% 93.770%</div><div>99.726% -403.227% 98.069% 98.458% 95.136% 98.749% 91.229% 87.622%</div><div>98.554% 93.282% -407.620% 94.650% 96.308% 98.750% 96.993% 93.478%</div>
<div>94.063% 93.381% 61.745% -379.400% 99.628% 99.921% 99.142% 96.797%</div><div>98.457% 99.337% 87.909% 95.141% -396.880% 99.531% 99.923% 99.921%</div><div>91.035% 96.408% 91.916% 90.255% -402.153% 81.079% 74.534% 96.212%</div>
<div><br></div><div>What can one tell from these?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:59 PM, bruce bruce <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruceb444@gmail.com">bruceb444@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div>Thanks for the input.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I am going to check this once I get access to system again tonight.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>But I thought the timing source dahdi_dummy is only good for features like MeetMe or conference rooms? or am I wrong and it has an effect on any type of calls and checking voice messages?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Ryan Bullock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rrb3942@gmail.com" target="_blank">rrb3942@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote style="border-left:#ccc 1px solid;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="h5">So I be it sounds like all the recordings are underwater.<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">Are you using dahdi for timing? Can you run dahdi_test?</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">Asterisk needs a good timing source, in the case when you don't have a physical card providing it, it relies on kernel ticks or the RTC (or HPET). Because of the nature of virtual machines they don't always get access to the processor when they want and therefore their timing can get skewed and can be bad for real-time applications.</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">There are some patches/work-arounds that you can do. You might want to google 'asterisk in a virtual machine' or 'asterisk timing virutal machine', or anything along those lines.</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">I think I remember in some of the recent dahdi or asterisk release notes that they changed some settings to be more virtual machine friendly. So maybe make sure you are running the latest versions?</div>
<br></div></div><div class="im">--<br>_____________________________________________________________________<br>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com/" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>
<a href="http://www.asterisk.org/hello" target="_blank">http://www.asterisk.org/hello</a><br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>