<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Gergo Csibra escribió:
<blockquote cite="mid:1474807393.20100224162952@gmail.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Wednesday, February 24, 2010, 3:56:50 PM, David wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Juan Sandro <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:juan.sandro@hotmail.com"><juan.sandro@hotmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Guys
We are using asterisk 1.4 on all of our platforms for a while now.
Some of our partners recommended to use asterisk 1.6 in order to improve
overall stability and performance.
Can someone please let me know if you have a such experience?
Also, do you have any other negative or positive comments on 1.6
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If it isn't broke, don't 'fix' it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There are benefits to 1.6, like dramatically enhanced SIP support,
much faster dialplan processing, easier faxing, changes to dialplan
syntax, and lots of other features. I would say the improvement of
going to 1.6 is only if you are trying to expect more from the same
gear, or want the new features. If you're not actually having
problems, don't change anything.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Yes, and check this page:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asterisk.org/asterisk-versions">http://www.asterisk.org/asterisk-versions</a>
as you can see, the 1.4 version is LTS, and the 1.6 isn't, but the
upcoming 1.8 will be LTS too. So don't change to 1.6 :)
</pre>
</blockquote>
That sounds reasonable, but as I have seen through several years
following the asterisk project, when 1.8.0 will be released it will be
far less stable than the more used and mature 1.6.0.X, for example. I
would prefer to do a middle step for upgrading, that would be 1.4.X -
1.6.0.X - 1.8.X when it becomes really stable. Asterisk history has
shown us that a newly released branch, no matter if it's LTS on the new
release schema, will need time and a large user base that adopts it to
report bugs and help stabilize it. I would not underestimate the actual
1.6.X branches.<br>
<br>
Just IMHO, any opinions welcome.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Ing. Miguel Molina
Grupo de Tecnología
Millenium Phone Center
</pre>
</body>
</html>