I see... problem with spa941 is it dont have LAN port (I'm thinking NAT the customer PC)<br><br><br>Sebastian<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Peter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peterpub2@aboutsupport.com">peterpub2@aboutsupport.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On 10.2.2010 18:06, Steve Howes wrote:<br>
> On 10 Feb 2010, at 15:50, Peder wrote:<br>
>> check out the Cisco SPA504G. They are the newer versions of the<br>
>> SPA922, support multiple lines and are fairly cheap too.<br>
><br>
> I second that. They're rock solid, good audio quality and easy to<br>
> provision.<br>
><br>
> S<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>SPA504G - 1 more vote for it.<br>
<br>
It is worth having 4 lines even if you need 1 initially.<br>
<br>
SPA504G supports G722 and sound is awesome even if you do not not use<br>
teh HD sound. If you do not care that mcuh about HD sound and do not<br>
need PoE SPA941 is a excellent choice - you get really a lot for the price<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Peter<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
_____________________________________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>