<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
> Again, how many calls were you able record using RAMdisk? Anywhere 300?<br>
<br>
</div>As I stated before, this is going to be dependent on how you're<br>
manipulating the calls and the gear you're running on. The nice thing<br>
about your 'just broadcast the entire LAN to the recording solution'<br>
is that the recording service just gets to throw away everything<br>
that's not an audio channel, and it doesn't have to do squat to the<br>
call. If it COULDN'T do a lot of recordings under these circumstances<br>
it wouldn't be worth any money.<br>
<br>
I don't think I've pushed my solution past 90 simultaneous recordings<br>
of MeetMe() mixing, with more than 100 AGI channels running, with<br>
assorted ChanSpy() jobs.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Bookmark my post, so when you reach your RAMDisk limit, you can join the big<br>
> league.<br>
<br>
</div>Anything I do as a scaling solution will be price versus performance.<br>
So since we're talking about a commercial solution to replace<br>
something that asterisk does, I'll have to find out what your<br>
commercial solution costs per channel, and compare that against the<br>
cost of cloning out an identical server. My solution scales to<br>
parallel servers just fine.<br>
<br>
Is OrecX really $199 per recorded channel? So that 300 channels you're<br>
talking about costs $60,000? So I can buy six $10,000 servers, each of<br>
which can run circles around my current solution, and still break<br>
even. I like my solution better.<br>
<div><div></div><br></div></blockquote><div><br>OrecX has a free version. I guess you didin't really check it out since your mind was already made up.<br><br>300+ Simultaneous calls recorded in perfect clarity for the price of an R200 or if you want higher end, a DL360<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Steve Totaro <br></div></div>