<div>Hi all,<br> <br>I'm planning to develop a custom autodialer application which will be dealing with its own model for agents and queues, therefore it won't use neither asterisk agents nor asterisk queues, nor asterisk cdr. The application will supply the whole reporting and agent managing features by itself.<br>
<br>The application will command asterisk through an AMI telnet connection using only the originate, redirect and hangup AMI commands plus the stream file AGI command (AsyncAGI patch will be required).<br> <br>The application will make outbound calls, then they will be redirected on the fly to dynamically defined meetme rooms, then the application will call extensions (registered endpoints) where it will know there are available agents in order to redirect them to the previous meetme rooms. If the application launched more calls than available agents it would play prompts while waiting for agents to become available.<br>
<br>Since the planned features set from asterisk to be used by the application will be very short, but the figures can be very large (in terms of concurrent calls, registered endpoints, traffic on the AMI port, etc..) I would appreciate if anybody can help me to find out what's the more suitable asterisk version to use in terms of scalability and stability:<br>
<br>- concurrent registered endpoints (SIP and IAX)<br>- concurrent two and tree party meetme rooms (whatever codec can be used)<br>- concurrent mixmonitor recordings</div>
<div>- concurrent playings for prompts<br>- commands and events rate on the AMI port<br></div>
<div>It's important to notice the advanced features from asterisk aren't a priority.<br> <br>I already looked over some links like <a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+dimensioning">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+dimensioning</a> and others but I found more questions than answers there.<br>
<br>Thanks in advance<br>Jose<br></div>