<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Wayne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Wayne@planetwayne.com">Wayne@planetwayne.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
Steve Totaro wrote:<br>
><br>
> If you are set on "beta" then read no further then the next line.<br>
><br>
> File a bug report with a core dump.<br>
><br>
> OK opinion time.<br>
><br>
> Your server is more than adequate.<br>
><br>
> For my tastes, you are beyond bleeding edge on the Asterisk front.<br>
><br>
> Simply my opinion but if this is going to be a "real" "production"<br>
> "server" or something you want to use reliably then I would suggest.<br>
><br>
> 1.4.Latest Zaptel<br>
> 1.4.19 Asterisk (if infact that is the last version that had<br>
> chan_zap and not DAHDI)<br>
> 1.4.Current LibPRI<br>
><br>
><br>
> And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny.<br>
><br>
</div>Hi Steve,<br>
Thanks for the pointers. I must admit - I was leaning towards 1.6 as<br>
this apparently has support for SIP over TCP (?). My end goal with this<br>
was to try and get Asterisk talking to Exchange 2007 servers unified<br>
messaging.<br>
<br>
As for chan_skinny - I'm currently using this on an existing 1.2 server<br>
although from what I've picked up from previous posts (going back a<br>
while) the inbuilt version is now quite stable and possibly better than<br>
the older 'chan_skinny' (which I think the development has stopped for<br>
now?). This is why I opted to use it for the new 1.6 server.<br>
<br>
Still open to an suggestions though :)<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Thanks<br>
Wayne.<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>Second line.<br><br>File a bug report. <br><br>There are not nearly as many people on 1.6 as 1.2 or 1.4. <br><br>I wish I had stats, but many people from the old skool never wanted to go past 1.2, myself included. 1.4 has proven itself stable in my book with zaptel, I don't mess with DAHDI. I still do 1.2 installs for core systems. 1.4 was for app_rpt with the URI (a radio repeater controller that is USB based).<br>
<br>I think the people using 1.4 have been early adoptors or just started using asterisk at that version. They don't even know about Asterisk .3 that only supported Adtran equipment.<br><br>1.6.X is super beta and you are in the new frontier.<br>
<br>Out of the people using 1.6.x, you may be the only person to try chan_skinny.<br><br>You may be the first to find the 1.6.x chan_skinny bug, so start asterisk so it does a core dump and make a skinny call, then file a bug report.<br>
<br>Hopefully things on bugtracker have changed and it gets attention and not just closed or ignored. <br></div></div><br>-- <br>Thanks,<br>Steve Totaro <br>+18887771888 (Toll Free)<br>+12409381212 (Cell)<br>+12024369784 (Skype)<br>