Yup, even costlier than Portech. And we also tried chan_mobile as a low cost alternative, but that seems to be very buggy.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Duncan Turnbull <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:duncan@e-simple.co.nz">duncan@e-simple.co.nz</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Yip the VoiceBlue SIP units are very good but a bit pricey<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Gordon Henderson wrote:<br>
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Sasa Bobek wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
>> Hi all,<br>
>> We have been planing for a long time to set up GSM mobile trunks for<br>
>> termination, and were planing on going with analog GSM adapters connected to<br>
>> a VoIP gateway. Should we be concerned with such a set-up as far as voice<br>
>> quality and other issues are concerned? Any experiences with GSM terminal<br>
>> chipsets?<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Why not SIP based GSM devices? e.g. Portech?<br>
><br>
> Gordon<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
><br>
> asterisk-users mailing list<br>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>