<div class="gmail_quote">2009/4/15 Olivier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oza-4h07@myamail.com">oza-4h07@myamail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
May I ask : beside saving channels, what are the benefits of TBCT over bridging calls inside Asterisk ?<br></blockquote><div><br>I'm not aware of anything apart from saving channels...<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>What about caller ids ? I would say caller id should passed over to final callee after bridging but that should need some kind of signaling update.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Passing the original callerID during a forward/unattended transfer is standard North American functionality... Call comes in, forwarded out either over the same, or alternate, trunk, callerid left intact... A feature that can make using certain commercial PBXs in other countries somewhat problematic... <br>
<br>Updating the caller information during a call, including feeding back connected callee information, is I believe, a qsig/dpnss addition used within a private network (though there may be instances that it can work in a public network that I've not seen)... <br>
</div></div><br>d<br>