<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/2/22 Gordon Henderson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gordon%2Basterisk@drogon.net">gordon+asterisk@drogon.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi all,<br>
> I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My<br>
> next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have<br>
> the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...<br>
> 1- Using Intel CPU or AMD<br>
> 2- Use 32 or 64 bits<br>
><br>
> Can you help me please to choose between the above choices and what is the<br>
> advantage and disadvantage of each of choices<br>
<br>
</div></div>How many concurrent calls. How much transcoding?<br>
<br>
A 1GHz Via processor with 128KB cache will handle 100 concurrent calls<br>
with no transcoding. Anything above that is a bonus, and 64-bit is a waste<br>
for something like asterisk IMO.<br>
</blockquote><div>sorry for the ignorance what is "asterisk IMO"? <br>64 bits are usefull for trasncoding?<br>thanks<br>David <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
So use what you're most familiar with.<br>
<br>
Gordon<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> (\__/) <br>(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your <br>(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination. <br><br>