<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">> I know that in the past there have been people on this list who have</blockquote>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">> done very large scale asterisk deployments. Not sure if any of them<br>> are still around to comment.<br>
><br>> With that many extensions, I'll second using a SIP registrar like<br>> Freeswitch or OpenSer. Just use asterisk to provide the services.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"> </div></blockquote>
<div>OK, but I still did not get a reply to my original question: Why using SIP registrar in front of Asterisk and not simply use bare Astersik? can't it handle the load? (remember - in my case it doesn't handle the RTP, only signalling). Can't it handle so much registrations? (I am using realtime DB, it is has any relevance).</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Thanks! __Yehavi:</div></div></div>