<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2658.24">
<TITLE>RES: [asterisk-users] DSS1 vs SS7</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hello All, </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I have an Asterisk Box currently running 1.6.0, dahdi drivers and libss7 with a TE120P (01 E1) card for the past 02 months. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I have it connected to a Cellular Operator switch (MSC), and it is working perfectly. Traffic is still quite low, but increasing as we start to use it for new applications everyday. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I have made some stress call tests, using all available CICs at once, and had no problem at all.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Congrats to the perfect development of the SS7 support to Mr. Fredrickson.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hopefully soon we'll have MAP support as well. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Marco</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Mensagem original-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>De: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [<A HREF="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com">mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</A>] Em nome de Matthew Fredrickson</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Enviada em: sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2008 11:49</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Assunto: Re: [asterisk-users] DSS1 vs SS7</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Kevin P. Fleming wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Alex Balashov wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> Some carriers now do offer private SS7 instead of ISDN. But there is </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> absolutely no reason why you should be doing this with Asterisk. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> Asterisk-SS7 is quite tenuous at best. Unless you have some specific </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> reason to be using it, don't.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Actually, SS7 support in Asterisk 1.6.0 appears to be quite solid, and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> it is being used in a quite a number of production deployments.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks for the plug Kevin! :-)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Yeah, actually, if you guys want to know more there's an asterisk-ss7 </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>mailing list. Asterisk-1.6.0 with libss7 is being used in many </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>successful and high traffic installations around the world.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>The current record (that I have been told of) is an installation doing </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>over 100,000 calls per day. So try to beat that ;-)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Matthew Fredrickson</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Digium, Inc.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <A HREF="http://www.api-digital.com" TARGET="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</A> --</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Register Now: <A HREF="http://www.astricon.net" TARGET="_blank">http://www.astricon.net</A></FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>asterisk-users mailing list</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> <A HREF="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" TARGET="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</A></FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>