<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><br>Using FOP, I've met a situation which makes me ask this simple question :<br><br>Are both A and B commands bellow equivalent ?<br><br>A. CLI:<br>originate SIP/9122 application dial Local/9123@local<br>
<br>B. AMI/FOP:<br><a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Action: Originate<br><a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Channel: SIP/9122<br><a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Async: True<br>
<a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Callerid: 9122 Guest2 <9122><br><a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Exten: 9123<br><a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Context: local<br>
<a href="http://192.168.64.5">192.168.64.5</a> -> Priority: 1<br><br><br>I must add both 9122 and 9123 extensions are SIP extensions which default to "local" context.<br><br>When using B (AMI/FOP), I've got a :<br>
-- Got SIP response 480 "Temporarily Unavailable" back from <a href="http://192.168.100.195">192.168.100.195</a><br> > Channel SIP/9122-081d8f68 was never answered.<br>where <a href="http://192.168.100.195">192.168.100.195</a> is SIP/9122 hardphone IP address<br>
<br>When using A (CLI), everything works ok.<br><br>Regards<br></div>