<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<STYLE>.hmmessage P {
        PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY.hmmessage {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=hmmessage>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>I looked at quite a few options over the course of somewhere
around 9 months.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>We ended up going with Polycom VSX7000 series units. These
units are really designed to use H.323, but they have a SIP option that works
almost just as well. The only thing I seem to be missing that I've noticed
is control of remote sites camera's. By using SIP it's just like any other
phone on the network. I've been very happy.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>Good thing to, cause they're damned expensive
units.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=289084612-09062008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff>Ken</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Sanjoy
Rath<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:41 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Asterisk Users
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [asterisk-users]
Asterisk video alternatives<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hello,<BR> <BR>I am also planning to implement Video Conf. There
is AppConference you could evaluate.<BR> <BR>Curious, Did you get any
response from anyone on your question?<BR> <BR>Thanks,<BR>SR.<BR><BR>>
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<BR>> From: matiassurdi@gmail.com<BR>>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:24:24 +0200<BR>> Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk
video alternatives<BR>> <BR>> Hi.<BR>> <BR>> At the company I work
for, we use Asterisk to communicate with our <BR>> offices all around the
world. Recently, I've been asked to implement a <BR>> video conference
system, asterisk compatible/interoperable as possible.<BR>> It's preferred
but not required to be an open source solution.<BR>> <BR>> What options do
I have? wich would you suggest me to try? Any good <BR>> experience with any
of these systems?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks a lot.<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> -- Bandwidth
and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<BR>> <BR>>
asterisk-users mailing list<BR>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
visit:<BR>>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<BR><BR><BR>
<HR>
<A href="" target=_new></A></BODY></HTML>