<div>I'm not an expert, but FastAGI you use in a live channel over TCP connection ... Most people agree it is better because doesn't spawn a new process every time it is called ... but they also suggest to do not use in the same server ...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>DeadAGI you cannot use it in a live channel ...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>By the way, a2billing is a nice software ... Areski does a great job ... I neither use it a lot nor in a production high volume environment but I liked it ...</div>
<div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
Subject: [asterisk-users] Performance issues<br>
From: "chetherston miles" <miles.chet@gmail.com><br>
Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 10:20<br>
<table><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#f1c352" width="1">
<br></td><td valign="top">
<div class="PrivateMsgDiv"><!-- begin sanitized html -->
Hello,
<div>
<br></div>
<div>We are thinking in use asterisk-java to an billing solution, wich is the better choice, and if someone could give us a understandable description about the difference between DeadAGI and FastAGI, i found a very interesting project called asterisk2billing and they use DeadAGI, anyway wich one scale better?</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>And there is a tool for test performance?</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Roberto</div><!-- end sanitized html -->
<hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
<pre>_______________________________________________
<br>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a target="_blank" href="http://www.api-digital.com">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --
<br>
<br>asterisk-users mailing list
<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<br> <a target="_blank" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a></pre></div></td></tr></tbody></table></div>