<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 21/01/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">Steve Davies</b> <<a href="mailto:davies147@gmail.com">davies147@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
b) Attended. Wait for the call to answer, Press transfer, you will be<br>ordered a list of calls in the order 3, 2, 1 - This is 100% wrong. The<br>call you want is LAST in the list. If you have no CID, or have<br>forgotten the CID of the caller, you cannot easily transfer the right
<br>call, and might instead connect the wrong caller. Why would you offer<br>an unanswered call over an answered one anyway???<br></blockquote></div><br><div>Yes - I completely agree that the SNOM attended-transfer is screwy in the presence of a third call.
</div><div>It causes problems if you have a long-running call and want to leave that on hold whilst handling another call that came in, or if a third call starts to ring in the middle of transferring a pre-existing call.</div>
<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>Steve</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div>