<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=855405815-05122007><FONT face=Verdana color=#800000
size=2>Where bandwidth is not an issue but good call quality is, is there any
theoretical quality improvement to be had by using "slin" as the codec over an
inter-Asterisk IAX trunk rather than a-law (or u-law in the
US).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=855405815-05122007><FONT face=Verdana color=#800000
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=855405815-05122007><FONT face=Verdana color=#800000 size=2>Does
anyone know what the slin bandwidth is (compared to 64 kbps
a-law).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=855405815-05122007><FONT face=Verdana color=#800000
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=855405815-05122007><FONT face=Verdana color=#800000
size=2>Thanks</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=855405815-05122007><FONT face=Verdana color=#800000
size=2>Peter</FONT></SPAN></DIV><br><br>
<P align=center><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.</FONT></A></P>
</body></HTML>