It's not the Ethernet interface that would be the issue. The zaptel framework wouldn't be able to handle it with the way it uses interrupts.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Patrick</b> <<a href="mailto:asterisk-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl">asterisk-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:<br>> Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are<br>> you hoping to accomplish?<br><br>I can imagine it be used as a TDM-SIP gateway but if I needed such a box
<br>I'd rather go for a Lucent MaxTNT, Lucent APX8000 or a Cisco 5xxx or<br>look at FreeSWITCH which by design seems more suitable for these kind of<br>high performance applications.<br><br>> There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth of traffic...
<br>> therefore, what good would this do?<br><br>Why wouldn't today's powerful quadcore servers with Gigabit Ethernet<br>interfaces not be able to handle less than 100Mbit/s synchronous<br>traffic? Please enlighten me as I am no expert here.
<br><br>Regards,<br>Patrick<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com--">http://www.api-digital.com--</a><br><br>asterisk-users mailing list
<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>