On 9/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dan Austin</b> <<a href="mailto:Dan_Austin@phoenix.com">Dan_Austin@phoenix.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Lacy's response in the thread 'Why does<br>everyone seem to dislike *now?', has a small<br>bit that caught my eye.<br><br>Chan_Skinny made a lot of progress between 1.2 and<br>1.4, and even more in the later 1.4.X
releases.<br><br>I am curious as to which features/functions that<br>chan_skinny might be lacking compared to chan_sccp.<br>We (the community) now have a small, but active,<br>group of volunteers working on the chan_skinny code.
</blockquote><div><br>In the next week or so, I'll try to take a look at chan_skinny again before making any comparisons. It would be great if chan_skinny worked as well as chan_sccp. <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm not interested in re-igniting the flame-wars of<br>the past about these channel drivers, but I would like<br>to know what else needs to be addressed in chan_skinny<br>before it users of chan_sccp would consider using it.
<br><br>Thanks,<br>Dan<br><br>_______________________________________________<br><br>Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th. <a href="http://www.astricon.net/">http://www.astricon.net/</a><br><br>--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
<a href="http://www.api-digital.com--">http://www.api-digital.com--</a><br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Lacy Moore<br>Somewhere I wish I wasn't