Maybe the firmware uses GPL'd code? ;-)<br><br>Just a theory, don't sue me Polycom!<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/5/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Stephen Bosch</b> <<a href="mailto:posting@vodacomm.ca">
posting@vodacomm.ca</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Andrew Joakimsen wrote:<br>> Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is.
<br><br>The vendor made a request for 2.1.0 on my behalf and let it slip that it<br>was for one of my clients :)<br><br>What is it about current firmware that makes them so paranoid? For<br>pete's sake! If the argument is protecting IP, it's a lousy one.
<br><br>-Stephen-<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>