<HTML>
<FONT SIZE="2" POINTSIZE="11" DEFAULT="SIZE">On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:14:32 +0300, Dovid B wrote:<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
>----- Original Message ----- <BR>
>From: "Michael Graves" <<FONT COLOR=0000ff><U>dickson@covad.net<FONT COLOR=000000 DEFAULT="COLOR"></U>><BR>
>To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <BR>
><<FONT COLOR=0000ff><U>asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<FONT COLOR=000000 DEFAULT="COLOR"></U>><BR>
>Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 3:59 PM<BR>
>Subject: [asterisk-users] Anyone here have opinion on the Linksys SPA-400?<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>>I may have need for a small multi-port FXO i/f. Anyone have hands-on <BR>
>>experience with this linksys device?<BR>
>><BR>
>> On past projects I've used SPA-3000 & Digium TDM400 and found them <BR>
>> unsatisfactory.<BR>
>><BR>
>> Michael<BR>
><BR>
>Try Sangoma. It has worked great for me. What didnt you like about the <BR>
>TDM400 ? If you had issues you could try contacting Digium support. <BR>
<BR>
My asterisk install is an embedded system so a freestanding FXO i/f is prefered.<BR>
<BR>
I had one of the earliest TDM400s and it was frought with problems. Noisey, poor disconnection monitoring, sensitive to IRQ/PCI issues. It was a pain.<BR>
<BR>
Michael<BR>
</HTML>