That does sound low, especially if you have multiple devices behind a NAT. I have customers with 8 analog lines going into their analog phone system and just have 4 ATAs with 2 lines each. Of course, all of this traffic would seem to come from the same IP!
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mark Davies</b> <<a href="mailto:mark@microsupport.com.au">mark@microsupport.com.au</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-AU">
<div>
<p>Hi all,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I've just been told from an ex workmate that my VSP
(who I used to work for) has put an anti flooding limit of 80 SIP messages per
IP per minute in place.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I run the phone system for a facility that has a lot of
extensions, but would rarely have more than 4 or 5 simultaneous external
calls. Am I in danger of tripping over this limit?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It sounds dangerously low to me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks in advance,</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mark.</p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://Easynews.com" target="_blank">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>