Hi All, good? In that I will be able to collaborate with the community of asterisk and channel of the Steve Underwood, that really made and makes an excellent work, I can count on me.<br>I am ready in that will be necessary.
<br><br>Best Regards<br><br>Josue<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/1/6, Anton Krall <<a href="mailto:akrall@intruder.com.mx">akrall@intruder.com.mx</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I agree with your last argument, exactly how it should be, Digium's free<br>asterisk version has no warranties, as it should be, if you want support,<br>you have to buy ... that's the way it works and should work. My complain is
<br>regarding the issue that all related asterisk projects like unicall were too<br>spread around and usually no updated info is available, you can find bits<br>and pieces of info around about new releases (like in voip-info) but like
<br>what happened with unicall and 1.4, nobody knew Steve was droping support<br>for it ... hell, even somebody just saw the news and asked about it...<br>that's what sometimes worries me, the owner of the project has the social
<br>responsibility of updating the news and keeping the community in touch with<br>whats new, etc. for example SugarCRM, you can find everything on their page,<br>news, etc. in the case of Digium and Asterisk, information is scattered
<br>around and sometimes its hard to find news about certain stuff, like unicall<br>and this case.<br><br>Anyway, we are drifting from the initial point which was to hope and support<br>further development of R2MFC on the asterisk community so I propose a bounty
<br>to get Steve (sheesh, that's sounded like a hit bounty :)) I meant, a bounty<br>to convince Steve to help the community that still uses R2.... what do you<br>say?<br><br><br><br>|-----Original Message-----<br>|From:
<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-">asterisk-users-</a><br>|bounces@<a href="http://lists.digium.com">lists.digium.com
</a>] On Behalf Of Moises Silva<br>|Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:58 PM<br>|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br>|Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] no unicall on 1.4<br>|<br>|On 1/5/07, Anton Krall <
<a href="mailto:akrall@intruder.com.mx">akrall@intruder.com.mx</a>> wrote:<br>|> I think you are misunderstanding several points here Moises.<br>|May be<br>|<br>|> I do give Digium a break like you said, that's why you have options
<br>|I dont understand this. How is related that you give Digium a break,<br>|with the fact<br>|that I have the option of use sangoma, Digium or clone hardware?<br>|<br>|> But from the programmers perspective, if some open source software gets
<br>too<br>|> controlled by a company, then the synergy of open source is kind of<br>broken,<br>|MySQL is open source, but it is mainly ( only ) developed by the<br>|company itself, so please dont contribute to the widely missuse of the
<br>|"open source" concept. Open Source does not mean free, Open Source<br>|does not mean anyone is welcomed to contribute code.<br>|<br>|> all projects have rules and what I meant is that Digium right now is too
<br>|> controlling and that's why some programmers have decided to leave<br>asterisk<br>|Once again, the rules are not the main problem ( important factor<br>|though ), the main problem are the technical differences.
<br>|<br>|> and pursue other projects in which they fell more comfortable and can<br>|> provide code in an easier manner.<br>|Good for them!, more options for everyone.<br>|<br>|> What I really have never liked is cases like what happened to unicall,
<br>there<br>|> was no news or announcements, simply , in 1.4 it's not there anymore :)<br>|Anton, honestly, this is the part that "rings" into my head. Digium<br>|NEVER supported formally the development of Unicall, Unicall was NEVER
<br>|part of the formal Asterisk release or addons, so it was NEVER there!.<br>|Unicall was only Steves project that happens to work with Asterisk. If<br>|I write a channel driver, as long as I dont sign and fax a disclaimer
<br>|to Digium and is accepted, Digium does not have ANY responsibility<br>|about my code, in this case Steve's code. Even AFTER this, please<br>|execute this:<br>|<br>|asterisk -vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvr<br>|show warranty
<br>|<br>|and if you have the free edition as I suppose you will see a BIG<br>|<br>|NO WARRANTY<br>|<br>|If you want more support BUY ( if you havent done already ) Asterisk<br>|bussiness/enterprise edition.<br>|<br>|Kind Regards and Good Look!
<br>|<br>|Moises<br>|<br>|--<br>|"Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en<br><a href="http://www.gnu.org">http://www.gnu.org</a>"<br>|_______________________________________________<br>|--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
<a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br>|<br>|asterisk-users mailing list<br>|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>| <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>