<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>I have a mediatrix 1204 which is connecting with asterisk 1.2.9.&nbsp; I have created a howto as well, but I am now encountering one interesting problem that did not occur with asterisk 1.0.8.&nbsp; Every so often the mediatrix will not&nbsp;handoff a call to the asterisk box, until I change the login name on both the mediatrix box and asterisk for sip authentication. After that everything runs fine..for a while.&nbsp; I have scanned the logs but the only&nbsp;error I see&nbsp;every once in a&nbsp;while is &nbsp;<BR>
"<FONT class="">chan_sip.c:10988</FONT> in handle_request_subscribe: Got SUBSCRIBE for extensions without hint. Please add hint to 1877XXXXXXX in context default"<BR>
1877XXXXXXX is our 800 number<BR>
Has anyone had a similar issue?&nbsp; If I were to add a hint for the mediatrix how would I do this?<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
Thanks<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
Julian<BR ><BR ><BR ><BR ><BR ><BR ><BR>

<HR id=stopSpelling>
<BR>
&gt; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:38:31 -0400<BR>&gt; From: mhoppes@gmail.com<BR>&gt; To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<BR>&gt; Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version: 1.2.9.1 or older?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Ditto&nbsp;here..&nbsp;we&nbsp;were&nbsp;running&nbsp;1.2.6..&nbsp;decided&nbsp;to&nbsp;upgrade&nbsp;to&nbsp;1.2.9.1...<BR>&gt; crash&nbsp;crash&nbsp;crash&nbsp;crash...&nbsp;so&nbsp;we&nbsp;downgraded&nbsp;back&nbsp;to&nbsp;1.2.6&nbsp;and&nbsp;have<BR>&gt; been&nbsp;up&nbsp;for&nbsp;weeks&nbsp;at&nbsp;a&nbsp;time&nbsp;now&nbsp;without&nbsp;issues.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; On&nbsp;7/12/06,&nbsp;j&nbsp;&lt;j@intuitivecreations.com&gt;&nbsp;wrote:<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;I&nbsp;personally&nbsp;have&nbsp;had&nbsp;some&nbsp;issues&nbsp;with&nbsp;1.2.9.1&nbsp;in&nbsp;production&nbsp;and&nbsp;had&nbsp;to<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;revert&nbsp;to&nbsp;an&nbsp;older&nbsp;version.<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We&nbsp;are&nbsp;using&nbsp;1.2.6&nbsp;which&nbsp;has&nbsp;proven&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;pretty&nbsp;stable.<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Others&nbsp;might&nbsp;have&nbsp;different&nbsp;experiences.<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;j<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;On&nbsp;Wed,&nbsp;2006-07-12&nbsp;at&nbsp;15:31&nbsp;+0200,&nbsp;Andrea&nbsp;Spadaccini&nbsp;wrote:<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;Hello,<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;I&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;install&nbsp;Asterisk&nbsp;on&nbsp;a&nbsp;test&nbsp;machine&nbsp;that&nbsp;will&nbsp;soon&nbsp;become&nbsp;a<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;production&nbsp;environment.<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;Do&nbsp;you&nbsp;think&nbsp;that&nbsp;1.2.9.1&nbsp;is&nbsp;reliable?&nbsp;I&nbsp;read&nbsp;some&nbsp;posts&nbsp;that&nbsp;say&nbsp;it<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;isn't&nbsp;as&nbsp;good&nbsp;as&nbsp;the&nbsp;previous&nbsp;versions.&nbsp;Should&nbsp;I&nbsp;install&nbsp;1.2.8&nbsp;or<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;1.2.7.1?<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;Please&nbsp;give&nbsp;me&nbsp;an&nbsp;advice!<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;Thanks&nbsp;in&nbsp;advance,<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;_______________________________________________<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;--Bandwidth&nbsp;and&nbsp;Colocation&nbsp;provided&nbsp;by&nbsp;Easynews.com&nbsp;--<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;asterisk-users&nbsp;mailing&nbsp;list<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;To&nbsp;UNSUBSCRIBE&nbsp;or&nbsp;update&nbsp;options&nbsp;visit:<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; _______________________________________________<BR>&gt; --Bandwidth&nbsp;and&nbsp;Colocation&nbsp;provided&nbsp;by&nbsp;Easynews.com&nbsp;--<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; asterisk-users&nbsp;mailing&nbsp;list<BR>&gt; To&nbsp;UNSUBSCRIBE&nbsp;or&nbsp;update&nbsp;options&nbsp;visit:<BR>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<BR><BR></body>
</html>