<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I honestly do not see the big deal about using g729. It is a one-time
fee and you would only need to buy as many licenses as you have people
in ivr or voicemail if you have g729 phones. For a business this is
not a major expense. You are talking about spending $100-$200 (max $480
for all 48 potential callers if you don't have g729 phones) to expand a
T-1 from 23 calls (PRI) to 48 calls by your measurement - a doubling of
the usage of the T-1 for less than one month's cost of the T-1. ROI at
less than a month? That's a slam-dunk for most businesses.<br>
<br>
W<br>
<br>
Gabriel Afana wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid005b01c693c6$8a76ffa0$6500a8c0@GafanaPC"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2912" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">After all the overhead, for uLaw you
would need about 90kbps (give or take) and for G.729, you would need
about 32kbps (give or take). Therefore, you would have the following:</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">uLaw= about 17 calls</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">g729= about 48 calls</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I am trying to start a voip service
in my local area and sometimes seeing these numbers make me wonder how
using VoIP for larger companies could possibly be profitable if you
require a $500+ data T1 just have a decent connect (unless you use
g729....?)</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">- Gabe</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>