<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1505" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=495154900-21022006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>so you think this problem is asterisk and not a internet
problem? My customers also complain alot about IAX2 connection to teliax
which seemed to work better in older * versions. I have tried everything
with no success, i switched to sip and its alot better but not
perfect...</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Adam
Robins<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 20, 2006 6:51 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4
IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText53496 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Thanks, but we already have
the TOS bits set to 0xB8, which matches the QoS settings in our switches and
routers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>This is definitely something that changed
in the 1.07 to 1.24 upgrade. We have a pair of identical 1.07 servers
connected via the same network pipe that do not exhibit these
issues.</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>I might try recompiling with the old jitterbuffer to see if it
makes a difference.</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B>
asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Jesus E
Zepeda<BR><B>Sent:</B> Mon 2/20/2006 5:02 PM<BR><B>To:</B> 'Asterisk Users
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer
Tuning<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>In my case I don't have a T1 or even a fractional T1, but cable
and have<BR>noticed that choppy calls can be reduced by adding tos settings.
Like:<BR><BR>Tos=lowdelay|throughput|reliability<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Jesus<BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: Adam Robins [<A
href="mailto:arobins@PharmaCentra.com">mailto:arobins@PharmaCentra.com</A>]<BR>Sent:
Monday, February 20, 2006 14:43<BR>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion<BR>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2
New Jitterbuffer<BR>Tuning<BR><BR><BR>I have now set the "resyncthreshold" to
-1, to turn it off. I have also<BR>set the "maxjitterbuffer" to
2000.<BR><BR>I still received 10 complaints of choppy calls today on Asterisk
1.2.4<BR>versus only 1 complaint on Asterisk 1.07.<BR><BR><BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com<BR>[<A
href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com">mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</A>]
On Behalf Of yusuf<BR>Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 10:27 AM<BR>To: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer<BR>Tuning<BR><BR>Adam Robins
wrote:<BR>><BR>Hi Adam<BR><BR>> After many days of playing with the new
jitterbuffer and trunking<BR>options for IAX2, I have finally received almost
acceptable quality. I<BR>am receiving 5-8 complaints a day of calls
"breaking up" from both the<BR>customer and agent sides. What I have
discovered is that in most of<BR>these cases, the new jitterbuffer performed a
resync during the call.<BR>Currently, I have the resyncthreshold, and all other
jb parameters at<BR>their default levels The traffic is running over a
fairly high latency<BR>WAN connection between Canada and Atlanta (IAX2,
ILBC). Idle ping times<BR>run about 85ms.<BR>><BR>I am interested to
know why you are using ilbc, n why not g729 ot g723<BR>or speex. What is
the size of the WAN connection. How many calls are<BR>you running over
this link. I just need to see how others are fairing<BR>with IAX2 over WAN
links, as I am the final stages of testing on my
side<BR><BR><BR>thanks,<BR>yusuf<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>--Bandwidth
and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --<BR><BR>Asterisk-Users mailing
list<BR>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<BR> <A
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</A><BR><BR>The
contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential<BR>and are
intended solely for addressee. The information may also be<BR>legally
privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole<BR>purpose of
delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this<BR>transmission in
error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this<BR>transmission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended<BR>recipient, please
immediately notify the sender by reply email and<BR>delete this message and its
attachments, if
any.<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>--Bandwidth
and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --<BR><BR>Asterisk-Users mailing
list<BR>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<BR> <A
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>--Bandwidth
and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --<BR><BR>Asterisk-Users mailing
list<BR>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<BR> <A
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV><!--[object_id=#pharmacentra.com#]-->
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt"><FONT size=2>The contents of this email
message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for
addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is
sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If
you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction or
dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and
delete this message and its attachments, if any.</FONT></SPAN></P></BODY><!--[object_id=#straightandnarrowinc.org#]--><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align=left><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"><SPAN style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Garamond"></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align=left><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"><SPAN style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Garamond"></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align=left><FONT face="Times New Roman"><SPAN style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Garamond">This E-mail, including any attachments, may be intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the sender and recipient(s) named above. This message may include advisory, consultative and/or deliberative material and, as such, would be privileged and confidential and not a public document. Pursuant to 42 CFR, any information in this e-mail identifying a </SPAN><SPAN style="COLOR: black">former, present, or potential </SPAN><SPAN style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Garamond">client of Straight & Narrow is confidential. If you have received this e-mail in error, you must not review, transmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it and you must delete this message. You are requested to notify the sender by return e-mail.</SPAN></FONT></P></FONT></FONT></HTML>