<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>Re: [Asterisk-Users] Packeteer ? Edgemark ? How to not re-cable ?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText57558 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>check out <A
href="http://www.exinda.com">www.exinda.com</A> if you are looking for a cheaper
solution to Packeteer, also offers more functionality as the design is third
generation.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Cheers,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dean</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on
behalf of Stijn Jonker<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tue 12/6/2005 4:15 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[Asterisk-Users] Packeteer ? Edgemark ? How to not re-cable
?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Hello A_Navone,<BR><BR>On 06-Dec-2005 21:11, A_ Navone
wrote:<BR>> I have customer wtih 30 stations in cubicles but they
only<BR>> have 1 rj45 per cubicle and that is for lan and internet.<BR>> I
would prefer the voip to be on separate net connection for quality<BR>>
purposes<BR><BR>Well I can imagine, or even to protect the softswitch
(Asterisk).<BR><BR>> but customer does not want to recable. How to
avoid voice quality<BR>> problems ?<BR><BR>Depending on the usage and switch
(not hub) this might even work without<BR>seperation.<BR><BR>But if you have an
switch that supports VLAN's and QoS and your VoIP<BR>phone/ata supports VLAN's
and QoS supports this, you can run it over one<BR>cable.<BR><BR>> I have read
about devices like Edgemark or Packeteer that<BR>> can prioritize voip
udp. Is that true ? Do they work ?<BR><BR>A packeteer sounds like
some serious $$ to be spend, I'm guessing that<BR>recabling might even be
cheaper.<BR><BR>Why not try the following, there are plugs available that
replace the<BR>current RJ45 outlets, or plugin an normal outlet and split the
cable in<BR>2 times RJ45.<BR><BR>See <A
href="http://www.datorhandel.com/se/products/679-F">http://www.datorhandel.com/se/products/679-F</A>
or<BR><A
href="http://www.abccables.com/ca-003805.html">http://www.abccables.com/ca-003805.html</A>
for an example you would need 1<BR>at both ends, or in the patchroom recable
only on that side.<BR><BR>This will violate some specifications but depending on
cable length and<BR>other external influences this might work.<BR><BR>In the
places I have seen this in place, it generaly works. Generally<BR>I'm not a
support of this, but if recabling is impossible or to<BR>expensive it might be a
solution. It's doesn't make the patch rack look<BR>any prettier..
;-)<BR><BR>Stijn<BR><BR><BR>--<BR>Met Vriendelijke groet/Yours
Sincerely<BR>Stijn Jonker
<SJCJonker@sjc.nl><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>--Bandwidth
and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --<BR><BR>Asterisk-Users mailing
list<BR>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<BR> <A
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>