<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=233291217-19112004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>We use
NI2, it's the "standard" for north american telco. We tried another I can't
remember for the life of me which it was, but we had the least problems with
NI2. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Jon Bebeau
[mailto:jbebeau@1nettw.net] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, November 19, 2004 8:22
AM<BR><B>To:</B> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<BR><B>Subject:</B>
[Asterisk-Users] "Best" line protocol for T1<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hello all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'm provisioning a T1-PRI for a Digium T410P with
my local TELCO. The TELCO has asked me to pick a line protocol
and has the option of several RBS protocols, like 5ESS (Lucent), IN2 and
others. The switch is a 5ESS, but the "normal" (according to the sales
rep) protocol is IN2. I see from the doc on zaptel, that many protocols
are supported. As I have a choice, is one of the PRI protocols "better"
that an another? I suspect that some protocols support features over
another but can't find much on the specifics. Recommendations and
reasons please.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jon</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>