<html>
<body>
At 08:23 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Try reading what people say
before ranting. He has a *CDMA* modem. Can you offer him good modem
support for a CDMA modem? If not, try to avoid making yourself look so
foolish.</blockquote><br>
Oh good gawd... I thought he was rambling some obscure sort of part
number from some fly by night electronics company. Yeah, you're
right... That would cause significant impediments.<br><br>
I had mistaken his claim for one of those WinMoDumbs that use the CPU to
do the work of what would ordinarily be handled by the hardware package
(Rockwell comes to mind.)<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Actually, most CDMA modems
use AT commands, just like most GSM modems do.</blockquote><br>
I wasn't speaking of the Hayes AT command set... Actually, I expect
and demand that if something is called a modem nowadays that it
understand the hayes AT command set. There were a few manufactured
way back when that had their own command sets. Heck, my ancient
TRS-80 Model 100 had a built in modem that knew not of
AT-Anything.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""> They both an extended set
of the usual AT commands, with special commands to access cellular
related features.</blockquote><br>
With the difficulties of not having broadband I can understand why he's
stuck with what he's got...<br>
Personally, I like my hardware as adaptable as possible.<br>
Suggestion:<br>
<a href="http://www.arcelect.com/StarPoint_Digital_CDMA-1xRTT_Cellular_Modem.htm" eudora="autourl">http://www.arcelect.com/StarPoint_Digital_CDMA-1xRTT_Cellular_Modem.htm</a><br>
(or something similar... If your OS doesn't speak RS232c you're
probably running Minix)<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""> The GSM stuff is openly
documented. I think the CDMA guys are a bit more annal retentive, but
they also have a spec for the standard CDMA modem
interface.</blockquote><br>
All Hail Phil Karn (KA9Q - Pioneer of CDMA)<br><br>
GSM is popular in Europe, but CDMA has better coverage area, hence it's
much easier to deploy since you don't need to have as many sites to cover
a particular area. Not as many sites = less cost to build the
plant.<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Regards,<br>
Steve<br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Asterisk-Users mailing list<br>
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" eudora="autourl">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" eudora="autourl">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a></blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
Best Regards, <br>
Karl J. Vesterling<br>
<b>E-Mail:</b> kjv@ken-ton.com<br>
<b>Yahoo Messenger:</b> karl_vesterling<br>
<b>ICQ: </b>1548052<br>
<b>AOL Instant Messenger:</b> n2vqm<br>
<hr>
<b>Telephone:<br>
Washington DC:</b> (202) 448-3009 Extension 0<br>
<b>Annapolis MD:</b> (240) 524-6706 Extension 0<br>
<b>Seattle WA:</b> (360) 516-1822 Extension 0<br>
<b>Niagara Falls NY:</b> (716) 286-9175 Extension 0<br>
<b>Buffalo NY:</b> (716) 608-1121 Extension 0<br>
<b>United Kingdom:</b> 0870 3403428 Extension 0 </body>
</html>