<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff size=4>Are there digium licenses
for G711 ?</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=steveu@coppice.org href="mailto:steveu@coppice.org">Steve
Underwood</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 05, 2004 15:47</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 -
licenses and opinions</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Rich Adamson wrote:<BR><BR>>We've got about five licenses
and a remote 7960's v6.3 running over<BR>>dsl working just fine. The
average user cannot tell the difference<BR>>between 711 and 729.
Installation was easy and straight forward, <BR>>although you'll find
comments in the archives that 729 installation<BR>>requires a non-scsi
drive on the * box.<BR>> <BR>><BR>Your average users must be
rather different from global average users, <BR>then. They must also be close
to deaf :-)<BR><BR>The MOS for G.729 are not bad for an 8Kbps codec, but
hardly compares to
<BR>G.711<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Steve<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>