[asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 168, Issue 14
ahmedmunir007 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 23 22:28:51 CDT 2018
The limit 10 is just an assumption. For real number I've set in my
conference server is 350 max participants to join. As per the load testing
I've performed on the server, after 400+ participants voice is getting
choppy so I've set the max limit to 350 globally for safe reason.
If 5 other participants want to join the bridge even max limit has been
reached, please advise to merge remaining participants that joined
dynamically created bridge B with A.
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:01:12 +0200
> From: Antony Stone <Antony.Stone at asterisk.open.source.it>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Merging 2 conference bridges
> Message-ID: <201808230001.12651.Antony.Stone at asterisk.open.source.it>
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
> On Wednesday 22 August 2018 at 23:49:29, Ahmed Chohan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would like to know how can I achieve merge 2 conference rooms in same
> > asterisk server. For example 10 users joined bridge A and max user limit
> > set to 10. If more than 10 users try to join this bridge A, 11th user
> > should join to the dynamically created bridge B and merge with bridge A.
> > that all eleven participants should be able to talk to each other.
> My first question upon seeing this is:
> - if you want all 11 people to be able to talk to each other, why do you
> a 10-participant limit on the original conference?
> I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One
> is to make it so simple that there are _obviously_ no deficiencies, and
> other way is to make it so complicated that there are no _obvious_
> - C A R Hoare
> Please reply to the
> please *don't* CC
Ahmed Munir Chohan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the asterisk-users