[asterisk-users] Double queue calls being delivered to agents

Richard Mudgett rmudgett at digium.com
Wed May 4 21:58:47 CDT 2016

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Derek Bolichowski <derek at empire-team.com>
> wrote:
>> I posted this over in asterisk-dev, realized I probably should have put
>> it here.
>> Hi there,
>> We’ve been having a strange issue with a customer’s queues where a queued
>> call will ring an available agent, agent answers, then a second or two
>> later the agent is offered a second call which they cannot answer, since
>> they’re already speaking with a client.
>> This in turn causes a few issues:
>> - Agent stats are no longer accurate, as it gets marked down as a ‘missed
>> call’.
>> - Cannot use ‘autopause’ feature any longer, as the second queue call
>> goes unanswered and pauses the agents.
>> The basic queue setup is as follows:
>> Autofill = yes
>> Ringinuse = no
>> Wrapuptime = 5
>> Strategy = fewestcalls (tried ‘random’ also)
>> Timeout = 15
>> We’re on Asterisk 11.21.2 currently.
>> In talking to a few colleagues, they seem to recall there being an old
>> patch for the Asterisk queues application that inserted a short 100ms delay
>> between delivering first and second calls.  I’ve scoured the web today, and
>> found some old forums posts of people looking for something exactly like
>> this, but haven’t found the actual patch, if one even exists.
>> I’m hoping someone may have some suggestions on some options we can try
>> to eliminate this issue.
>> Thanks for taking the time to read this.
> This issue has been around a long time and was just recently fixed and I
> think
> it was just released in the latest v11 version.
> See https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-16115

Looks like it will be in the next release as the issue does not have a
target release set.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160504/a66250b5/attachment.html>

More information about the asterisk-users mailing list