[asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 and WebRTC. Is wiki page still valid ?

[Olivier]

2016-02-18 14:57 GMT+01:00 Simon Hohberg <simon.hohberg at mcs-datalabs.com>:

>
> Is it implied here that both HTTPS and WSS must also come from the same
>> server (Same Origin Policy) ?
>>
> No, the same origin policy does not apply to web sockets.
>
> Then, can I also install my own WebRTC demo page on my own private
>> Asterisk server and access this demo page through HTTPS ?
>> If I'm not mistaken, this should fulfill all requirements.
>>
> It doesn't matter where the asterisk server is hosted. It is important
> where the web application comes from. If you don't want to use https and
> wss you only have the option to host the web app locally (on the same
> machine as the browser that loads the page), which probably makes sense
> only for development. Otherwise you have to use https and wss for the
> reasons discussed earlier.
>
> Hope it helps.



At least, it helped me to realize I still have several more things to learn
;-)

My setup is the following:
- an asterisk server,
- a PC,
- asterisk server and PC are installed on the same LAN
- sipM5 live demo outside my LAN
- no NAT/PAT configuration allowing incoming communications from the
outside.

Is using sipML live demo as a way to rapidly test private Asterisk WebRTC
capabilies, something achievable ?
What would keep this from working ?


>
>
>
> Simon
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160218/45d20774/attachment.html>