[asterisk-users] Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address

Eric Wieling EWieling at nyigc.com
Mon Jan 20 16:18:39 CST 2014


Make sure you do NOT have any *bindaddr options set in your sip.conf.  If you do, you are telling Asterisk to not allow the OS to pick the source IP and hence the routing.

The *bindaddr options are seldom useful.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of David Cunningham
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 5:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address

Hi Duncan,


The Asterisk machine also has a VPN IP address, so it has a route for 172.x addresses to go to tun0 VPN interface.




On 21 January 2014 08:30, Duncan Turnbull <duncan at e-simple.co.nz> wrote:


	On 21/01/2014, at 10:24 am, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:


		Hi Paul,
		
		
		The ngrep on the Asterisk server does show it being received. Have you any idea what would prevent it getting from the network stack to Asterisk on that machine?
		
		



	Have you got a static route on asterisk or your default gateway showing how to get back to the 172. addresses i.e. pointing to the vpn box for 172 addresses?

	Cheers Duncan
	


		On 21 January 2014 05:30, Paul Belanger <paul.belanger at polybeacon.com> wrote:
		

			On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:51 PM, David Cunningham
			<dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:
			> Hi,
			>
			> We have a Kamailio and Asterisk cluster, both machines being on a real 103.x
			> IP address and also on a 172.x OpenVPN address.
			>
			> The problem is that when Kamailo receives a call from the VPN and forwards
			> it to the Asterisk server on it's 103.x address, Asterisk never sees the
			> call.
			>
			> If Kamailio receives a call from the VPN and forwards the call to the
			> Asterisk server on it's 172.x address then it works. However, if the call
			> isn't from the VPN then forwarding it to the 172.x address doesn't work. So
			> basically the problem is going between the real network and the VPN.
			>
			> The question is, how can we make this work when calls are received on either
			> network on the Kamailio server and are forwarded to Asterisk?
			>
			> Using ngrep on the Asterisk server we see that it does receive the INVITE,
			> but Asterisk's logging shows no sign it at all. We guess it's a Linux
			> networking issue rather than Asterisk's fault, but don't know where to fix
			> it. We do have net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 on both the Kamailio and Asterisk
			> servers.
			>
			> Thanks in advance for any help.
			>
			> The ngrep on the Asterisk server:
			>
			> U 2014/01/17 13:15:15.599557 172 <tel:15.599557%20172> .x.x.x:5060 -> 103.y.y.y:5060
			> INVITE sip:9067268 at 103.y.y.y:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0.
			> Record-Route: <sip:172.x.x.x;lr=on>.
			> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.x.x.x;branch=z9hG4bK50c7.f49ceb73.0.
			> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.z.z.z:5062;rport=5062;branch=z9hG4bK806710997.
			> From: "9067271" <sip:9067271 at 172.x.x.x>;tag=198791249.
			> To: <sip:9067268 at 172.x.x.x>.
			> Call-ID: 1905625787 at 192.z.z.z.
			> ...
			>
			> 172.x.x.x is the Kamailio server's VPN address
			> 103.y.y.y is the Asterisk server's real address
			> 192.z.z.z is the calling phone's LAN address
			>
			
			Sounds like a routing problem opposed to an application issue. You'll
			have to fire up tcpdump on Kamailio and see what happens to the
			packet. The look at the local routing tables to see where it is
			getting routed.  If Asterisk is not receiving the patch, then Kamailio
			is not routing it properly.
			
			You'll be able to see everything once you have a pcap of the call.
			
			--
			Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc.
			Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
			Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger
			
			--
			_____________________________________________________________________
			-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com <http://www.api-digital.com/>  --
			New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
			               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
			
			asterisk-users mailing list
			To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
			   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
			




		-- 
		David Cunningham, Voisonics
		http://voisonics.com/
		USA: +1 213 221 1092 <tel:%2B1%20213%20221%201092> 
		UK: +44 (0) 20 3298 1642 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%2020%203298%201642> 
		Australia: +61 (0) 2 8063 9019 <tel:%2B61%20%280%29%202%208063%209019> 
		
		-- 
		_____________________________________________________________________
		-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
		New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
		              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
		
		asterisk-users mailing list
		To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
		  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



	--
	_____________________________________________________________________
	-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
	New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
	               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
	
	asterisk-users mailing list
	To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	




-- 
David Cunningham, Voisonics
http://voisonics.com/
USA: +1 213 221 1092
UK: +44 (0) 20 3298 1642
Australia: +61 (0) 2 8063 9019




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list