[asterisk-users] Change RX Signalling Bits in Dahdi drivers

Optical Phoenix opticalphoenix at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 10:33:49 CST 2013


Thanks, will do

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Justin Killen <
jkillen at allamericanasphalt.com> wrote:

>  You’d probably be better off sending this to the dev list (asterisk-dev)*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Justin Killen****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Optical Phoenix
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:56 PM
> *To:* asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Change RX Signalling Bits in Dahdi drivers****
>
> ** **
>
> Greeting,****
>
> I am trying to setup PLAR signalling in asterisk. I have modified the
> FXSLS TX bits in dahdi-base.c on line 2580, and I can make calls.****
>
> ** **
>
>                                     .sig_type = DAHDI_SIG_FXSLS,****
>
>                                     .bits[DAHDI_TXSIG_ONHOOK]  =
> DAHDI_BITS_ABCD, /*changed by  for PLAR*/****
>
>                                     .bits[DAHDI_TXSIG_OFFHOOK] = (0),
> /*changed by  for PLAR*/****
>
>                                     .bits[DAHDI_TXSIG_START]   =
> DAHDI_BITS_ABCD, /*changed by for PLAR*/****
>
> ** **
>
> When I got to change the rx, its a bit more complex. I have learned from
> this list that dahdi_rbsbits() handles the rx bits, but my changes seem to
> have no effect. Does anyone have a good understanding of this function? I
> would appreciate any help you can provide.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> case DAHDI_SIG_FXSLS:****
>
>                         if (!(cursig & DAHDI_BBIT)) {      /*Dennis
> RINGING  */  /*<----- I think this is checking if the state is different
> from a set value? needs clarification*/****
>
>                                     /* Check for ringing first */****
>
>                                     __dahdi_hooksig_pvt(chan,
> DAHDI_RXSIG_RING);****
>
>                                     break;****
>
>                         }****
>
>                         if ((chan->sig != DAHDI_SIG_FXSLS) && (cursig &
> DAHDI_ABIT)) {  /*<------ Why is it checking DAHDI_SIG_FXSLS? do I need to
> modify this to be 1111 also?*/****
>
>                                        /* if went on hook */****
>
>                                     __dahdi_hooksig_pvt(chan,
> DAHDI_RXSIG_ONHOOK);  /*<----------I think this is passing it to a function
> that reacts to the signal in this case the onhook signal?*/****
>
>                         } else {****
>
>                                     __dahdi_hooksig_pvt(chan,
> DAHDI_RXSIG_OFFHOOK);  /* <------ same here but with the off hook? */****
>
>                         }****
>
>                         break;****
>
>               case DAHDI_SIG_CAS:****
>
>                         /* send event that something changed */****
>
>                         __qevent(chan, DAHDI_EVENT_BITSCHANGED);****
>
>                         break;****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> Dennis****
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>                http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130306/2e5185f8/attachment.htm>


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list