[asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in queue

[Eric Wieling]

I should have actually suggested qualifyfreq=10.

Qualify has nothing whatsoever to do with registration.

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Nicholas [mailto:danny at debsinc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 5:15 PM
To: Eric Wieling; chris at acsdi.com; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Cc: 'Benny Amorsen'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in queue

A qualify value that low would be a resource hog (some phones can't even re-register in 10 seconds).  The Nagios solution would require a custom shell, so it would less needy to make the shell be a daemon independent of either.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Wieling [mailto:EWieling at nyigc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:12 PM
To: chris at acsdi.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Danny Nicholas
Cc: Benny Amorsen
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in queue

Using qualify=10 ?

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Harrington
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 5:11 PM
To: Danny Nicholas
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Benny Amorsen
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in queue

How do you propose that Asterisk determines that the endpoint has vanished off the network without waiting for a 10-90 second timeout period?



On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com> wrote:


	Not doubting how quickly Nagios can respond, but if the Nagios solution is going to place a call using Asterisk, wouldn’t it be just as efficient (or more so) to depend on Asterisk? 

	 

-- 
-Chris Harrington

ACSDi Office: 763.559.5800
Mobile Phone: 612.326.4248