[asterisk-users] fw: Re: Conf Bridge

[Bryant Zimmerman]

----------------------------------------
 From: "Andrew Latham" <lathama at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:04 PM
To: bryantz at zktech.com, "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial 
Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Conf Bridge

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Bryant Zimmerman <BryantZ at zktech.com> 
wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> RE: Conf Bridge.
>
> I am looking into a project that would need 8 to 10 thousand parties in 
a
> single conference.
> Most would be on mute but 5 to 6 would be presenters.
>
> Is the new conf bridge solid enough to handle this kind of load?
> Any ideas on hardware projections?
>
> If not 8 to 10 thousand how many would be realistic?
>
> If not asterisk any other suggestions.
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> zktech

>>If most are on mute, then have them call into a stream of the actual 
conference.
  
>>~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama at gmail.com http://lathama.net ~

>>Andrew sorry for the redundancy please ignore if you like. 

Andrew   

Thank you for your feed back. We are looking at all of the options, but how 
would they call into a stream of the conference? Are you thinking of 
stacking multiple asterisk servers? 

The fundamental question I am trying to answer is how many participants 
could I have in a confbridge and what kind of hardware spec would I need to 
get the volume.

Thanks

Bryant


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130117/6006cadc/attachment.htm>