[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 - ADDMEMBER event in queue_log not using member name [SOLVED]

[Olivier]

2012/10/11 Kinsey Moore <kmoore at digium.com>

> Hi Olivier,
> >My questions are:
> >1. Is it possible to configure Asterisk 1.8 (I'm using 1.8.12 but I can
> >upgrade to 1.8.17 if, and only if, necessary) so that ADDMEMBER entries in
> >queue_log refers to member name instead of member location ?
> >If positive how should this be configured ?
>
> This feature is not present in Asterisk 1.8.17.  It was only committed to
> trunk since it is a change in behavior.  It is in the Asterisk 11 branch,
> betas, and release candidate.
>

Now I'm seeing the related commit in Asterisk 11 changelogs (I closely
looked at 1.8 changelog but I didn't looked at Asterisk 11 branch).
I don't know if the corresponding patch is invasive or not but  having the
option to change Asterisk 1.8 behaviour would have been much appreciated.

Is there any change to have this option considered ?


>
> >2. Page https://wiki.asterisk.org/**wiki/display/AST/Queue+Logs<https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Queue+Logs>do not
> >mention ADDMEMBER events.
> >Is it normal ?
>
> Not all pages on the wiki are complete.  Obviously this page is missing
> ADDMEMBER and the corresponding member removal event.  Feel free to comment
> on the page that they are missing.
>

OK

>
>
> Kinsey
>
> --
> ______________________________**______________________________**_________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**users<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20121011/c3f1106a/attachment.htm>