[asterisk-users] Fax for Asterisk success rates?

[Brett Lehrer]

>How many fax and voice calls (which codecs for tha latter ones ?) are on
>average using your DSL line ?

>1. Previously, I experienced failures during the process of converting
>incoming PDF documents into ready-to-send fax image files while the reverse
>process (from a fax file into a PDF or whatever document) never failed.

>I would be curious to check if a greater failure rate for outbound faxing
>(greater than inbound faxing failure rate) could simply comes from image
>processing, before any transmission.

>2. Though your DSL line may have enough bandwidth from your location to its
>DSLAM, chances are packets are dropped or delivered too late for T.38
>faxing.
>An interesting test would be to use an Asterisk PBX hosted somewhere at
>"close range" from netVortex fax gateways : that would remove most
>networking issues out of the equation.

I'll have to look more closely into what codecs we traditionally use, but g.722 up and ulaw down is common.  Generally don't have more than 2-3 calls active at once.  At most, 5, and that's a rarity.  Record for fax is 4 simultaneous send/receive, but typically just 1, maybe 2.  I imagine that's encroaching on the upper limits of the 768 kbps upspeed.  I've wondered about how lag might impact the problem but I just don't know how I'd go about testing it properly without spending a bunch of money on hosting.  

I do my PDF -> TIFF conversion on another machine with ghostscript.  Here's the line:

gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=tiffg4 -sOutputFile=<TIFF_FILENAME> -f <PDF_FILENAME>

I changed from tiffg3 to tiffg4 because the filesize got cut in half assuming that the less time spent transmitting, the less chance there was to run into a problem that might stop the fax.  However, most failures that I've looked at seem to occur immediately or fail to connect at all, rather than get cut off due to a hiccup in the connection.

Brett Lehrer