[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

[Danny Nicholas]

I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in
that branch.  1.4 is the "stable" branch, but it seems that all of the
resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a "rabbit hole"
you really shouldn't be headed into.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8


Hello
i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. 
i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent
calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to
upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100
concurrent calls. 
my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all
versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100?
please advise?

Tarek Sawah

Information Technology  Adviser

Integrated Digital Systems

CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM

USA: +1 386 492 9993

 		 	   		  
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users