[asterisk-users] Recommendations

[Todd Routhier]

Danny,

 Thanks for your help.

OK, guess I got confused by the fact that 8 comes after 4.

Maybe I missed something in the version number or maybe I am just, well,
lacking sleep.

When did the version numbers start going backwards?

By the way, I hope I am not top posting but Gmail is a little whacky,
trying to get use to it.

--Todd


On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com> wrote:

> 1.4.42 is newer than 1.4.8.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier
> *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 4:49 PM
> *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations****
>
> ** **
>
> Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since
> the version I am using 1.4.8?
>
> You are actually recommending an older version than I am using?****
>
> ** **
>
> In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine?****
>
> ** **
>
> I usually build from source but I am thinking about just installing CentOS
> 5.3 and installing it from YUM but I will have to see what version that
> installs.****
>
> ** **
>
> Any good or bad things to say about using AsteriskNow?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com> wrote:
> ****
>
> App_read hangs up the call if an error is encountered in 1.4 (really
> annoying as I don’t want my user to have to enter 2 or more times).  This
> behavior was resolved in 10.0.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *john Millican
> *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM
> *To:* asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: ****
>
> If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either
> 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2.  10.0.0-rc2 removes a “feature” that was killing me
> in 1.4, but if you aren’t doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you
> know.  Another thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the
> Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some “joy”.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [
> mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com<asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com>]
> *On Behalf Of *Todd Routhier
> *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM
> *To:* asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations****
>
>  ****
>
> I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while, it
> has served me well.****
>
>  ****
>
> Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation of
> Asterisk.****
>
>  ****
>
> My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure the queue
> features and functionality have been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am
> wondering what version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the
> best version in terms of queue features, functionality.****
>
>  ****
>
> Also, an OS recommendation would be great. Been running on CentOS forever
> and no reason to want to change. Just looking for the best version of
> CentOS to run the best/stable version of Asterisk on.****
>
>  ****
>
> To be clear:****
>
>  ****
>
> Recommended:****
>
>  ****
>
> Asterisk Version:****
>
> OS & Version:****
>
>  ****
>
> I am even thinking about using AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I
> have worked with it before and it used to be possible to still do custom
> stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX available for the
> simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if it's there. Does it have an
> intergrated web server that I could run a lightweight control panel on?
> That would be another plus.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks in advance for any help, been out of touch for a while. I will be
> doing my research and lots of reading over the next few days but thought it
> couldn't hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Danny,
> Can you expand on what "feature" 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing you
> problems with IVR?  I am starting to undertake some major IVR scripting so
> am rather curious.
> Thanks,
> JohnM****
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20111128/857ef155/attachment.htm>