[asterisk-users] Securing Asterisk

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at digium.com
Wed Jul 27 12:42:38 CDT 2011


On 07/27/2011 01:35 PM, Matthew J. Roth wrote:

> This feature would actually be a bit like "alwaysauthreject" in that
> it breaks RFC compliance for the sake of security, so it's not a
> completely lost cause.  However, pining away on a mailing list about
> how simple the work would be instead of doing it yourself is.

'alwaysauthreject' in not imcompliant with any RFCs; the RFCs define 
response codes that *can* be used to indicate (for example) that the 
Request URI does not represent a target known to the receiver (404 Not 
Found), but does not mandate that the server respond with that code in 
that situation.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming at digium.com | SIP: kpfleming at digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list