[asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?

[vip killa]

please stop complaining about people complaining and filling up the mailing
list.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Bryant Zimmerman <BryantZ at zktech.com>wrote:

> Who really cares what the version number is. As long as the new version has
> new features in it and is more stable than the old one. Please all stop
> filling the mailing list with useless posts. Live with the new numbering
> schema and get on with life.
>
> Thanks
> zktech
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Pezhman Lali" <lopl at lopl.net>
> *Sent*: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:00 AM
> *To*: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <
> asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>
> *Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?
>
>
> I think  2.x is more better. may be 10.X is more creative, and has a binary
> figure.but will not explain the true meaning
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Adam Moffett <adamlists at plexicomm.net>wrote:
>
>> So next is version 11 and then version 100?
>>
>>
>> it has been mentioned that 10 is of course 2 ... think not in base 10
>>>
>>> On 22 July 2011 22:26, Matthew J. Roth<mroth at imminc.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kevin P. Fleming: The versions all go to ten. Look, right across the
>>>> board, ten, ten, ten and...
>>>>
>>>> Asterisk Users: Oh, I see. And most open source projects upgrade to
>>>> two?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin P. Fleming: Exactly.
>>>>
>>>> Asterisk Users: Does that mean it's better? Is it any better?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin P. Fleming: Well, it's eight better, isn't it? It's not two. You
>>>> see, most blokes, you know, will be running at two. You're on two
>>>> here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on two on
>>>> your software. Where can you go from there? Where?
>>>>
>>>> Asterisk Users: I don't know.
>>>>
>>>> Kevin P. Fleming: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that
>>>> extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?
>>>>
>>>> Asterisk Users: Put it up to ten.
>>>>
>>>> Kevin P. Fleming: Ten. Exactly. Eight better.
>>>>
>>>> Asterisk Users: Why don't you just make two better and make two be the
>>>> top number and make that a little better?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin P. Fleming: [pause] Asterisk goes to ten.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, couldn't resist.
>>>>
>>>> Matthew Roth
>>>> InterMedia Marketing Solutions
>>>> Software Engineer and Systems Developer
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>>>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>>>
>>>> asterisk-users mailing list
>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pezhman Lali
>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110727/685e43a5/attachment.htm>