[asterisk-users] New VirtualBox Beta Has PCI Pass-Through Support

Steve Totaro stotaro at totarotechnologies.com
Fri Jul 8 20:00:48 CDT 2011


On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info> wrote:

> Patrick Lists wrote:
>
>> With virtualized environments prone to timing issues does this make sense
>> at all?
>>
>
> Wouldn't the timing be taken from the PCI device?  This is how it's working
> on my systems now.  Also, it's not something I would be put into production
> until I've hammered it.
>
>
> Doug
>
>
> --
> Ben Franklin quote:
>
> "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
> Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>
>
Hammer it.  Setup whatever requires the most timing, IAX, MOH, conference
bridge or whatever.

Setup SIPp (http://sipp.sourceforge.net/) to initiate x calls for the
duration and then you call in and see where it breaks.

Just to test the timing.

Piggy back a couple of quad pri systems and have them call each other and
SIPp into whatever app is most sensitive to timing.

what does cat /proc/interrupts show?

This is cool stuff, I will lab it up when I get some spare cycles.  I wonder
what happens with multiple VMs running Asterisk, I guess only one gets
access to the card, or it would be a mess.

Doesn't someone make a USB dongle for timing in VMs?  Anyone have input on
the best way get timing to multiple VMs.

I think it is time to start playing with Asterisk in various VM platforms
and configurations.  I want a stock underlying OS and stock guest OSes.

Xorcom has that USB FXX device.  Maybe a few of those, or multiple dongles.
Multiple FXX PCI cards with no modules assigned to different VMs?

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110708/5bf192b0/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list